Employers are more accepting of tattoos and piercings than they used to be: social norms have softened, jobs have followed suit, and one of the reasons for this is the influx of millennials into the workplace. Nevertheless, the attitude towards tattoos remains ambiguous and not everyone who has them is ready to demonstrate their work. Whether it would be legal for the employer to remove the piercing and hide the tattoos at work – Valeria Konovalova, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Personnel Management at the State University of Management, told Life about this.
The specialist recalled that, in accordance with the Labor Code, an employee is obliged to comply with the internal labor regulations and labor discipline – this implies obligatory obedience for all employees to the rules of conduct defined in accordance with the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, other federal laws, a collective agreement, agreements, local regulations, labor contract.
Local regulations, in particular, internal labor regulations, can establish rules for the behavior of employees within the organization. This includes requirements for the style of clothing and appearance of the employee, due to the activities of the employer or the characteristics of the employee’s work function. The list of these conditions may also include requirements that he does not have tattoos and / or piercings in open areas of the body and the need to hide existing tattoos under clothing.
A local regulation may explicitly state that workers are not recommended to get tattoos on open areas of the body, and existing tattoos must be hidden under clothing, Konovalova said.
“Employers should consider how reasonable these rules are, and if they intend to completely ban visible tattoos, then they will need business reasons for this. “, — explained the expert.
Thus, failure to comply with the requirements of local regulations entails disciplinary action, up to and including dismissal. In general, the requirements for the appearance of employees (for example, the absence of tattoos on visible parts of the body, the ban on nose piercings (ring, earrings in the nose) are legal. Misconduct of the manager may be the result of the employee’s appeal to the court, which may take the side of the employee .
Most often, resistance to tattoos and piercings can be encountered in an organization with a strict dress code policy; organizations in which the requirement to remove the piercing is due to safety concerns in the workplace. In addition, the presence of tattoos and piercings is not particularly welcome in the civil service, in the army and law enforcement agencies, educational and medical institutions, and airlines.
Allowing tattoos and piercings in the workplace can have certain advantages for the company, said Life’s interlocutor. For example, the opportunity to attract young qualified candidates, the message that the company values their skills and credentials more than appearance, as well as the image of a modern and open image of the organization. But there are downsides: tattooed workers may face rejection from colleagues and clients. In addition, the approval of tattoos may encourage employees to demand other ways of expressing themselves that the company does not allow.
Previously, Life talked about five jobs hated by society, which only an unprincipled or narrow-minded person can get a job. Among these, for example, is the vacancy of a trader.