In a rare and historic standoff, Harvard University has openly defied US President Donald Trump, refusing to comply with White House directives aimed at curbing alleged antisemitism on campus.

Elite institution has taken a bold stand against Trump’s orders triggering nationwide attention and political backlash.

Tensions erupted after pro-Palestine protests swept across several US campuses including Harvard. Trump administration responded with sweeping measures — pushing for structural reforms in top universities including changes in admission policies hiring processes and teaching methods.

Harvard rejected the directives accusing the administration of trying to suppress academic freedom and exert political control.

In retaliation, Trump suspended .3 billion in federal funding allocated to Harvard and threatened to strip the university of its tax-exempt status unless it issued a formal apology for what the White House described as tolerance toward antisemitic behavior.

According to the administration Harvard failed to take action against discriminatory incidents involving Jewish students and faculty. Trump made his stance clear — Harvard must apologize and enforce stricter policies against antisemitism or face further consequences.

Typically religious and educational institutions in US enjoy significant tax benefits and access to federal research grants. Losing this support could lead to substantial financial setbacks for Harvard, especially in research and innovation sectors where federal funding plays a critical role.

Confrontation has sparked debate nationwide with critics warning against political interference in education while supporters argue that universities must be held accountable for fostering safe and inclusive environments.

Read more: Trump Administration Plans to Deport 10 Million Undocumented Immigrants in One Year

This marks the first time in US history university has directly challenged presidential directive on such a scale — putting one of the world’s oldest institutions at odds with political power over freedom of expression and institutional autonomy.