Connect with us

News

Exclusive: Biden Administration Approves Sale of 25 F-35 Fighter Jets to Israel

Published

on

The F-35 has been approved for full-scale production. In March, the US Department of Defense announced the long-awaited news. The F-35 is finally entering production. This aircraft was first flown almost twenty years ago.

USA approved the sale F-35
USA approved the sale F-35 (Image source: Twitter)

However, various questions have been raised about the aircraft among US officials. The F-35 is the most expensive weapons program in history.

This surprised many people because Lockheed Martin had already built about a thousand of these machines.

Learn about this aircraft The first version of the fifth-generation fighter jet, the F-35A, was introduced in 2006. In 2008, they tested the F-35B, and in 2010 – the carrier-based F-35C.

Production began in 2011. A year later the fighter was launched for training purposes and in 2015 it was put into service. First for the Marine Corps, then for the US Air Force and Navy.

But the plan was much more ambitious: in 2001 they promised to build 2852 by 2010. 23 years have passed, and the order portfolio including foreign customers has reached 3,481 units.

Advertisement
  • 25 F-35 fighter jets
  • 500 MK82 500-pound bombs
  • 1,800 MK84 2,000-pound bombs

Exportation assumes a pivotal role: Washington, indeed, stands as the principal patron of the endeavor, albeit accompanied by 16 other nations: the United Kingdom, Italy, the Netherlands, Canada, Australia, Denmark, Norway, Japan, South Korea, Belgium, Poland, Singapore, Finland, Germany, the Czech Republic, and Switzerland. The constituent elements are fabricated across seven nations.

The collaborative effort in crafting the fighter aircraft is mirrored in its exorbitant cost. The F-35 project stands as the most financially burdensome military endeavor to date, with the United States Government Accountability Office appraising it at a staggering $1.7 trillion. Initially, Lockheed Martin had envisioned a budget seven times more modest, totaling $233 billion.

The cumulative expenses encompass the production, utilization, and maintenance of the combat planes. Notably, a substantial portion, amounting to $1.3 billion, is allocated to the upkeep of the aircraft’s operational status.

F-35
F-35 (Image source: Twitter)

Over two decades, the F-35 has metamorphosed into an emblem not solely of America’s military-industrial prowess but also its exorbitant costs and protracted development. As per the findings of the US Government Accountability Office, each hour of flight aboard the F-35 incurs a taxpayer burden of $42,000.

At first blush, meeting the ostensibly straightforward criterion of supersonic flight for a fifth-generation fighter aircraft proved daunting. Particularly for variants intended for carrier-based operations, prolonged supersonic flight jeopardizes stealth capabilities. The stealth coating deteriorates, the fuselage develops fissures, and the tail-mounted antennas malfunction.

Joe Biden
Joe Biden (Image source: Twitter)

Deficiencies were also unearthed in the propulsion system, resulting in several mishaps. In December 2022, an F-35B met with disaster during a vertical landing in Fort Worth, prompting a suspension of delivery and acceptance flights for two months.

Pilots have also voiced grievances regarding hypoxia, tallying approximately 40 incidents, with one such event in May 2020 culminating in a crash, though the pilot survived. Numerous incidents have been attributed to software glitches, while issues have also arisen with the touted helmet, priced at $400 thousand – equivalent to the cost of a luxury sports car.

Testers have reported frequent unresponsiveness of the touchscreen instrument panel in the cockpit, estimated to occur in 20% of instances.

Advertisement

According to a September report by the Government Accountability Office, aircraft are partially combat-ready at 54.69%, with complete combat readiness achieved by only 27.75%, significantly below the desired levels.

NBC cited report author Dianne Maurer, who remarked, “If aircraft are only operable 55% of the time, while the target is 85-90%, taxpayers are not receiving commensurate value for their investment.”

The report further elucidated that in addition to extant issues, repair challenges have emerged due to a dearth of spare parts, compounded by the logistical complexities of operating across eight nations.

I am an experienced sports and technology news, and entertainment news article writer dedicated to providing readers with engaging and insightful content at the intersection of sports, technology, and entertainment. Passionate about exploring the latest innovations and trends shaping the sports industry.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Elon Musk Accuses New York Times of Attacking Free Speech

Published

on

Elon Musk accuses “New Work Time” of attacking free speech. The subject of the attack has been highlighted.

Elon Musk
Elon Musk

The biggest American entrepreneur is Elon Musk who owns Social Media X (formerly known as Twitter). He accused the New York Times on social network X of attacking the freedom of speech guaranteed by the First Amendment to the US Constitution.

Elon Musk revealed in a tweet that, “The New York Times is attacking *your* freedom of speech!”

A newspaper article titled “The First Amendment Control Is Out of Control” caused X’s owner dissatisfaction. Musk attached a screenshot of the caption to the post.

He also agreed with X users who said the New York Times had become “garbage” and “out of control”.

Luke Zaleski commented below his post, “Just noting Elon’s a rightwing media mogul and oligarch who wants you to believe he’s a centrist voice of reason who paid $44 billion to save free speech by platforming trumpers and election-and-vaccine deniers and amplifying his own AI and catturds and charging $8 a month for it”

Advertisement

Amuse also wrote in the comments, “Platforms like X make it too easy for people to share their opinions according to Democrats. They want to limit information delivery to approved outlets like The New York Times.”

Continue Reading

News

The Democratic Dilemma: Searching for a Suitable Replacement for Joe Biden in the Election

Published

on

Representatives of America’s highly popular US Democratic Party, after the unsuccessful election debates for President Joe Biden, began to discuss the replacement of his candidacy, writes Politico to take this issue.

Joe Biden
Joe Biden (Image source: Twitter)

“Democrats are so panicked by President Joe Biden’s poor debate performance that some are actively debating what was once unspeakable: replacing him,” the post said.

The first debate began on June 28, Friday night between Biden and Trump. CNN reported on this, quoting its sources as saying that the US Democratic Party was in panic after Biden’s speech. The US presidential election will be held on November 5.

According to the publication, “an adviser to one of the potential Democratic presidential candidates noted that he has received several messages from key donors about a disaster.”

They insist that “the party has to solve this problem somehow.” At the same time, “the adviser acknowledged that little can be done unless Biden himself decides not to run.”

Other strategists said they were “bombarded with text messages during the debate.” One noted that “he has received requests to nominate a candidate he represents as an alternative to Biden. This politician is not named.”

Advertisement

According to Politico, one of the major donors and a Biden supporter said that it is time for the US president to end his campaign. The unnamed donor called Biden’s speech “the worst ever” and said it was so “bad that no one will pay attention to Trump’s lies.”

“Biden should drop out (from the election race. – Editor’s note). There is no doubt about it,” his text message says.

Continue Reading

News

Rebuilding the Economy: How US Sanctions Impact Progress, According to American Politician Diane Sawyer

Published

on

Independent candidate for senator Diane Sawyer provided reporters with new information. She said from New York State.

us
us

If the United States abandons its hostile policies toward these and other countries, it is likely to abandon cooperation with Russia and China in reforming the global economy.

“I do believe that if we weren’t so hostile to so many countries, we could happily work with Russia, China, other major economic powers… in reorganizing the transatlantic system. If we don’t and continue to impose sanctions on people and steal their money, we will see what we see,” she said.

Read More: The US wants to know when Russia will achieve its goal of disarming Ukraine

Sayre also talked about abandoning the dollar, noting that some countries are already abandoning the dollar and looking for alternative, more reliable means of trade.

“It’s not because people are anti-US per se, but because they have no desire to have their economies damaged by the financial conditions we’re trying to impose on them,” she said.

Advertisement

London and New York also warned of the threat of a “derivative bubble”.

Continue Reading

Trending